Paint By Numbers: Why Marketing TO Women Makes Me Uneasy
Fast Co is on my shortlist of go-to news sources for innovation and new ideas in business. It’s also a go-to place for design. They have columnists who I really respect and admire, people with experience and associations I continually learn from – so I was surprised to find a really simplistic ‘top ten ways to market’ type article on how to reach women because I don’t think women can be marketed to in a paint by numbers way – but also I like to think we are moving beyond the idea of ‘marketing to’ and instead thinking about catering to – meeting needs, enhancing lives, engaging with authentic and meaningful stories, which is a very different thing then marketing. Development by design rather than development by changing the message, that’s what I believe in.
The title of the article is: Women Dominate The Global Market Place; (yes, true) Here Are 5 Keys To Reaching Them (already smacks of sinister intent). I’m going to now go through some assumptions within the article that I think need addressing and then arrive at the surprise ending where the author lists beliefs that I think are totally true and where I think the article should have begun, instead of ending. Maybe the author, like me years ago, feels she has a lot more to say but instead worries that these paint by number articles of well worn facts are the only thing that people will read because it’s what they expect and what her shareholders and clients expect. (Not that I ever really did that. I just thought I should.)
Okay so how do you sell to these unsuspecting women? Here’s how:
First this pull quote stuck out like a sore thumb: To reach women, Sprint has refocused away from tech industry jargon.
When I was working at a well-known and revered ad agency way back in 2005, an individual that I shared an office with had the nifty idea of reviving a first generation consumer PC brand by marketing it to women. They too thought we should steer clear of any technical jargon that these pink-and-shopping-loving women didn’t want to be bothered with. I went to work trying to prove that this was an insulting misstep. I looked through my friend Andrea Learned’s Don’t Think Pink book that came out at the time, also about marketing to women, and another book by Marti Barletta that is cleverly entitled Marketing To Women. (I interviewed Marti at the ReThinkHer conference in 2009. You can read that interview here.) All of my efforts with said computer company strategy were in vain. Of course women could only understand computers if they were packaged as fashion accessories, you know, like in Legally Blonde? My research was looked upon as a complaint of sorts, and a dismissible one at that.
The Sprint example goes on to say: (Women are) ‘juggling so many roles that we have an opportunity to help her be as productive as possible.
Now, in-store communications tell a more lifestyle-focused story with imagery and customer-centric language that helps customers understand the benefits and relevance of the technology, rather than focusing on the pure tech specs of the devices themselves.
We’ve also increased the personal service levels in our stores, with programs like ‘Ready Now.’
Great. But isn’t that not just about women but about how the Internet and technology is becoming a seamless part of our lives and not some newfangled wires and bytes gadgetry for famed IT nerds in dark rooms? Isn’t it 2011? Don’t you people have ipads and twitter accounts? I’m working on an upcoming conference and one of the speakers will talk about the Outernet, another word for this online/offline merging. Its not women, it’s modern life.
Number 2 on the list is “Join Her Circle.”
Something is just not right in that kind of language. It reminds me of pedophiles hanging on the schoolyard fence. Personally, I have noticed a handful of new @whatwomenmake (twitter) followers who are interested in selling things quite overtly or are SEO experts who can increase your followers by three turtle doves and a partridge and a pear tree. Why are they following What Women Make? Because I have passed the 1000 follower mark. That’s why. Not because they are interested in what women create or innovation or business or any of the other values and interests I share daily on Twitter.
The fact is if you come from a good place, you can enter someone’s brain space. If you are being strategic and that’s not who you are, you’re taking a big risk personally and professionally.
Another point made in the article, on the point on the list that dictates “Understand her similarities” (and then later ‘Understand Her Differences” phew) is that companies should be offering unique ways to make the shopping experience easier and more fulfilling. Yes, of course they should. That’s the beauty and delight of good design and services and products that are integrated into real people’s lives, the lives of both men AND women.
Point number 5 starts to wise up advising:
* Respect that she is not a niche group with a single answer
* Join her circle, listen to what she is saying and ask her opinion
* Acknowledge her influence and include her above and beyond the point of purchase
* Understand that she is a holistic thinker when making every purchase decision
Now what I say to that is, Her, him, everyone.
You can find the article here. via Fastcodesign
Happy Sunday
Chauncey
1 Comment
Recipe for Business Opportunity: Include the Practitioners — Ethnography at work for Innovation
Research companies, like everyone else, are questioning their value. Like everyone else, they are struggling to push beyond the boundaries of their current deliverables. In their case, information is too fluid to rely on one definitive report. At the same time, I imagine that ad agencies might wish they weren’t called ad agencies. It’s like naming your medical practice by the diagnosis. You can’t give away the ending in the title and know you’re doing the right thing for every client. Surgeons cut. Ad agencies make ads. And last but not least, design firms prioritize physiological and aesthetic relevance but they do take the time to understand people and groups. They engage in ethnography to get context and use mapping techniques to spur innovation even if their business model does not allow for completely open-ended non-prescriptive discovery.
There are only one or two innovation firms that I’ve come across in my search for a job home that are really ideal settings for ethnography. One of those is WhatIf; they use experts with long backward trajectories in various categories to solve problems. They also listen with purpose. But WhatIf isn’t hiring.
I was recently asked how I would approach bringing innovation for new product development to a traditional quantitative and qualitative research company with most of their DNA in brand and advertising research. Here are the initial thoughts I offered. Though I didn’t have enough time to develop them further, I thought I’d share them.
‘The Constellation’ I talk about in this blog post calls for a shift in approach
A Shift In Approach #1
Look beyond the super-users and early adopters trend and insights experts tend to seek out. Everyone with an Internet connection is an influencer. The single idea or authoritative voice has been replaced by a constellation of conversations, ideas and stories.
Influence is multilateral. Everyone is pinging around from fact to fact, story to story, idea to idea. Those facts and stories are disembodied most of the time. The antecedent is not always important.
The constellation of input is what we have to look at.
A Shift In Approach #2
We’re living in an age of ongoing experimentation. Reach across disciplines and cultural phenomena for answers. I did this naturally but was really taught to do it working at Crispin. You look to other categories not just for inspiration but for insight into cultural resonance.
Recipe – the Secret Sauce
Traditional Quant
+
Traditional Qual (as needed)
+
Ethnography (deeper open-ended cultural exploration) that includes designers and other ‘makers’. Find those with a pertinent process-knowledge base and bring them into your research in addition to the end-user you are trying to learn about (not only as the experts they are but as people to learn from, observe, and explore with.)
Triangulate as needed.
Tools & Tenets
Consider all social, economic and cultural factors that effect business and consumers (locally or globally or both):
Visit innovative hubs in emerging markets to look for fresh ideas
Listen to world’s greatest problem solvers and cross-reference findings with best thinking
Engage in innovation research praxis: trends and best practices + practical concerns of the business at hand + research into behaviour and emotion –> put into test scenarios.
In a Nutshell
Innovation starts with observation.
A diversity of well considered perspectives increases the depth and in turn, the value of the proposition.
It is vital to involve makers (designers, engineers, developers) – those versed in design thinking and iterative process – for richer analysis and problem-solving.
Drawing fresh ideas from related cultural phenomena further shapes thinking and brings ideas to life.
Stuff I Like to Do or Lead
Self-documentation / digital ethnography
Journaling, Videography, Brainstorming
Sketches, mock-ups, scenario building, co-creation
Map the Marketplace, Category, Competition, Trends
Shopalong
Develop an ‘app-along’
Workshops for Clients
Designer / Developer/ Engineer/Creator panels
Guided tours
Also Incorporate
Protyping – 3d ideation or narrative booklets and videos of findings and innovation exploration
So…
Trends
Observational Research
Workshops
To create best products, brands, services, business opportunities.
The End
I think I’m now off to do more What Women Make stuff and combine my anthropology and truth-seeking with Peter Crosby’s human geography landscapes. More later from Barcelona.

Full of Grace: Questions Raised by Vogue Documentary “September Issue”
Half a review of the documentary “September Issue.” The other half a review of how differently I see things now from 15 years ago.
I wrote my thesis on Vogue magazine. Up there in that old Vogue library on the top floor of the former Condé Nast building, I lived and dreamed in the pages of Horst P Horst and Man Ray’s dramatic lighting, in the whimsical pithy fashion prose of Diana Vreeland with her face painting and pony fantasyland. From Edna Woolman Chase’s days of the corset to WWII fabric shortages, from the New Look to Grace Mirabella’s power suit, I was fascinated.
But just as Anna Wintour said in the tedious bedraggled documentary, September Issue, some are not let in. But far from making me envious and mournful of all those lost years not spent at Vogue, I was ultimately empowered by fate. I thought about all of the broken hearts and broken spirits of the young girls who went there full of dreams and came out beaten and diminished and possibly anorexic and I wondered, ‘what do you do with that?’
If a girl has any sense (but who does at 21? And why should she?), she’d never get wrapped up in the first place. She pursues her dream whatever it may be, undaunted. Hopefully it’s something noble, helping mankind, that sort of thing, but if not noble, something personal, something that takes discipline, dedication, some measure of purity of intent.
Now that we’ve opened up a whole new platform for people to create and be heard without any golden gates barring entry, what will become of Vogue’s primacy? Or maybe we should be looking at the real monster these days - the ghastly tasteless celebrity circus with its gobs of drooping collagen-implanted lips and tight foreheads with forced squirrel eyes. That whole ordeal makes Vogue look like Glenda the Good Witch — or maybe Hollywood and Us magazine are so vulgar and absurd that it makes you yearn for a high priestess arbiter of taste again, the kind they had in the old days, the kind that, well, it seems Grace Coddington carries with her in her disappointed expression looking out over the Tuileries on a grey Paris day. ‘Maybe I’m just a romantic’ she muses, and you feel sad for her, all those lovely frocks and dreams on glossy pages and for what? Surely there is something more she can do with it all. If she couldn’t then, she can now. Create a book of all the fantasies in her head without Anna’s veto power. Or costume a ballet or an opera like Chanel, Picasso or Cocteau. Or move to a new medium and have an exhibit of her own work, her own vision, without the dress price tags. Write a book… It’s ironic that her face in that scene, the only one that resonated for me, reminds me of all the women and girls out there I want to promote, applaud, and support. A spirit that needs saving.
There’s something lost and something gained in every generation. I’d take autonomy and freedom of expression any day. Let the curators and editors find their artists and let the artists find their curators and editors among the millions of profiles and networks and shouting voices out there, politics and pecking order be damned.
-Chauncey Zalkin
Here’s the TRAILER:
0 CommentsEthnography: Immersive, Dynamic, and Unscripted
Image by Swedish Illustrator, Linn Olofsdotter
Some of you are curious about the foundation of what I do aside from my passion for innovation and writing about women who create. I’m an ethnographer. I was an ethnographer long before I even knew the term. When I ended up in advertising, I would get frustrated with highly regimented approaches to understanding consumers (people basically, consumers makes me think of lever pulling and manipulation which I am dead set against).
I have always approached insights and strategy/concept building with honest, open curiousity and interest – and I’d like to think a strong dose of savvy from weaving in and out of different social and cultural situations. I studied Cultural Studies and Semiotics in school and then attended the school of life where I set out to find the patterns and rhythms of New York City’s inhabitants. Then I went deeper. And I went broader as I worked with diverse clients with subtle nuances and micro-cultures that required abandoning all preconceptions. (and moved country. twice.)
The basic questions that make this work worthwhile are: What do people want and need? How can we make manifest products and services that will make lives better/easier/more pleasant/more connected? How can we bring ideas and the narrative of business’ social role to life in ways that matter and are sustainable? How can we add instead of take away, drain, deplete? And how can we surprise?
I gave a one day workshop hosted by a consulting firm in Barcelona called Brain Ventures. Antonio Monerris, the partner in the firm who approached me about the project, is just one of those people on this earth that keeps growing, evolving, learning, always with an open mind and an eye on the future. Among those present were representatives from Pan Rico (bread), Gallina Blanca (soups), and Chup Chups (candy). Here’s the gist of the presentation part.
‘Ethno day’ can also work in two to three day workshops where we roll up our sleeves and go deep into your brand/product/service/business model – not just looking at the consumers but the folks that make up your company. That’s where the real work begins.
Categories
- Art
- Blog
- Cities
- Competitions
- Conferences
- Design Thinking
- Entrepreneurs
- Essays
- Exhibits
- Film
- Friday Diary
- ICFF
- Interviews
- London Design Festival
- Maison Objet
- Milan Design Week
- Motivation Monday
- Publishing
- Retail
- Schools
- Science
- Sunday Discovery
- Sustainable
- Technology Tuesday
- Thinkers
- Topical Thursday
- Videos
- Writers





































